The stipulated line chart depicts the information regarding the proportion of travelers who visited different attractions in Brighton in United Kingdom over a period of two decades from 1980 to 2010. The mentioned parameters are art gallery, pavilion, pier and festival.
It has been clear from the data that, pavilion and festival were the most popular places among tourists. In 1980's pavilion were at second position with 23% visitors. But after 1985 it was showed a steep upward trend and peaked at 48% in 1995. The years 2000 and 2010 witnessed a decline it its popularity and the visitors were reduced to 35% and 30% respectively. While, pavilion showed some what steady growth, even though it was started off with 30% traveller's preferred option. But after a slight drop of 4% in 1985, its popularity were stable at almost 26% despite some mere fluctuations.
On the other hand, Art gallery showed a completely different trend, after the sudden hike in 1985 (38%), its visitor number kept on declining till the end of the period. In 2010, only 8% vacationist went over there. Whereas, the pier sight seers numbers illustrated an upward trend despite some fluctuations. From 10% visitors in 1980, the proportion were doubled within just 2 decades of time.
In conclusion, attractions like pavilion and festival were able to attract travelers consistently throughout the period, while others lost there popularity in between.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 106, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'In the 1980s'.
Suggestion: In the 1980s
...the most popular places among tourists. In 1980s pavilion were at second position with 2...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 388, Rule ID: SOME_WHAT_JJ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'somewhat' (=slightly)?
Suggestion: somewhat
...0% respectively. While, pavilion showed some what steady growth, even though it was start...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 215, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...0, only 8% vacationist went over there. Whereas, the pier sight seers numbers illustrat...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, regarding, second, so, whereas, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1204.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16738197425 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71213395278 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 106.607317073 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639484978541 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 351.0 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.8503371824 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.6153846154 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9230769231 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.15384615385 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0915611535734 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0307850414956 0.103423049105 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442451289887 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0648738524547 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0449783225264 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.