The line graph shows the number of players in four different sports (badminton, tennis, basketball, rugby) in a particular European country between 1985 and 2005.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The presented line graph compares 4 distinct sports in terms of their number of participants in a certain European nation from 1985 to 2005.
Overall, it is evident that rugby was the least popular discipline among 4 items over the period. In addition, while the figures for tennis and badminton generally declined, that for basketball displayed an upward trend.
Turning into detail, in 1985, badminton and tennis shared the same amount of 200 competitors. However, over the next 20 years, the number of badminton players plunged, whereas that of tennis made up a mild fluctuation. At the end of the period, in comparison to badminton participants, which was only 50, tennis players were significantly more numerous, with approximately 180 citizens.
Regarding to remaining disciplines, initially, the value for basketball was similar to that of rugby, reaching about 50 players. In the next 10 years, basketball continued to show its dramatic upward trend, while rugby dropped moderately to the bottom of about 25 competitors, before growing gradually to over 50 in 2005. Meanwhile, that of basketball maintained its substantial expansion to above 200, surpassing other sports as the most common category among 4 counterparts.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 478, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t common category among 4 counterparts.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, so, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1047.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42487046632 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00089921824 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642487046632 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.1948405371 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.333333333 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4444444444 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162661870754 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0639860738655 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578525013477 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104431187881 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0678326318482 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.