The line graph shows the past and projected finances for a local authority in New Zealand.
The line graphs compare the previous and the future of finance projectes for a religion authority in New Zealand from 2012 to 2022.
It is clearly from the line graph that rates revenue and user charges are predicted to increase dramatically while grants and subsidies will maintain the same level during this period 10 years.
In 2012, rates revenue stood at approximately 1,500 million and the next is user charges and borrowings are around 1,000 million while grants and subsidies is by far lowest at 400 million. In 2016, grants and subsidies reached a peak at about 800 million while borrowings hittted the bottom at 600 million. At the same time, both rates revenue and user charges increased slightly.
From 2016 to 2022, rates revenue is predicted to rise to peak the highest at about 2,400 million and user charges will be increase at 2000 million. Borrowings will be fluctuated to reach the plateau at 1,400 million in 2020 before droping at the same level of the fisrt year. In contrast, grants and subsidies is expected to stay constant at around 500 miilion during this period of time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 374, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...stant at around 500 miilion during this period of time.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 920.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89361702128 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39742014653 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510638297872 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2256631909 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0923671272956 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0658820210233 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.150198496938 0.0843802449381 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131764042047 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.190888175581 0.0819641961636 233% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.