The presented two maps indicate a series of modification in a village between 1995 and now.
Generally, the village has changed radically over the period. Indeed, while land for planting and agricultural activities vanished, those of residential areas and sporting infrastructures were expanded substantially.
Turning into detail, regarding to the northern part, there were a medium number of houses distributed on both side of main road, along with a building block near the heart of the village in 1995. From then on, more houses have been built now, with an easier accessibility made by a branch leading off the main road to the additional residential area. Meanwhile, farmland and forest park to the northeast of the village in 1995 were combined before being transformed into a golf court, integrating two tennis courts inside.
Regarding to southern region, in 1995, boats could approach the local thanks to a fishing port, which led to a fish market on sea shore. In addition, a chain of shops was located opposite to the fish market. However, at present, across from the restaurants, apartments were built on the site where the fish market used to be, whereas on the sea, the fishing port was replaced.. By contrast, along with the café, the hotel remained unchanged despite the construction of an adjacent car park.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 229, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to the fish market. However, at present, across from the restaurants, apartments ...
^^
Line 7, column 335, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...here the fish market used to be, whereas on the sea, the fishing port was replace...
^^
Line 7, column 378, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...n the sea, the fishing port was replaced.. By contrast, along with the café, the h...
^^
Line 7, column 494, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e construction of an adjacent car park.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, regarding, so, then, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1120.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1376146789 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82422814663 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 106.607317073 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651376146789 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 333.9 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 3.36585365854 327% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4975861399 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13242993797 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0546161766346 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561075026438 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0926873422148 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0598252728493 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.