The map below is of the town of Garlsdon. A new supermarket (S) is planned for the town. The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The supplied map demonstrates the two different possible locations of a newly proposed supermarket in the Garlsdon in which averagely 65000 people lives.
Overall, first location is in the countryside while another is in the town centre surrounded by industries and housing.
As is presented in the map, first location is at the north-west periphery of the town and 12km to Hindon which contain around 12000 population. Main transport system railway is connecting Hindon, city centre and Cransdon directly while road route locate on other side is from Town centre to Hindon intersecting S1location.
Whereas, proposed point 2 is approximately in the middle of the town and near by transport routes like raillway and roads. The Bransdon with 15000 population located at 16 km distance while Cransdon with 29000 inhabitants is around 25km. These facilities make site 2 more suitable for suprmarket however less space might be available for construction at site 2 in comparision to S1.

Votes
Average: 8 (2 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 207, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ailway is connecting Hindon, city centre and Cransdon directly while road route l...
^^
Line 4, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...indon intersecting S1location. Whereas, proposed point 2 is approximately in the...
^^
Line 4, column 75, Rule ID: NEAR_BY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nearby'?
Suggestion: nearby
...oximately in the middle of the town and near by transport routes like raillway and road...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 828.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24050632911 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90952058705 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658227848101 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.1032447452 43.030603864 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 118.285714286 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199344152234 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0830622802367 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.056974002364 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112187269899 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453034548211 0.0819641961636 55% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.