The map below is of the town of Garlsdon. A new supermarket (S) is planned for the town. The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The map illustrates the information about 2 potential places namely S1 and S2 that a new supermarket of the Garlson’s town can be built in. It can be clearly seen that one of the sites is located in the countryside while the other one is in the middle of crowded area in Garlson.
The first place (S1) is in the countryside in the North-West area of the town which is far away from the city center and residential area. Furthermore, in this site, there are two convenient transportation routes: railway and main roads to Hindon which is a town with the population of 10000 people. However, S1 does not seem to be convenient for citizens of two other cities to come.
On the other hand, the second site is situated in the middle of the city where is no-traffic zone and has only railway through that area. Nonetheless, there is a nearby industrial area and a housing zone in the North and South where citizens in the town can easily access. In addition, it is fairly appropriate for those living all 3 towns: Hindon, Brasdon and Cransdon to reach it. To go from Bransdon, people can only visit supermarket through the main road, but from Cransdon and Hindon, they can either go by train or by car through the main roads.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 307, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the population of 10000 people. However, S1 does not seem to be convenient for ci...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, nonetheless, second, so, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1008.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56108597285 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67307093904 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542986425339 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 304.2 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.7101842993 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 112.0 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5555555556 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6666666667 5.23603664747 204% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195499027741 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0777010391842 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496688725167 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129025813201 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0117763703588 0.0819641961636 14% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.