The map below is of the town of Garlsdon. A new supermarket (S) is planned for the town. The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket.
The map compares two potential locations for a new supermarket in a town of Garlsdon.
It is clear from the map that the first site (S1) is outside the town, while the second site (S2) is in the town center.
Looking at the site S1, it is in the countryside and it lies 12 kilometers to the northwest of the town. This location is good for local residents of Garlsdon and Hindon. S2 is right in the center of Garlsdon and it is also close to the housing area.
In addition, there are three main roads from Hindon, Bransdon and Cransdon to Garlsdon. However, the central area is a no traffic zone, so parking would be a problem in S2. By contrast, S1 lies on the main road to Hindon, it would be more difficult to arrive from Bransdon and Cransdon. Main transport system for both locations is railway which links between Hindon and Cransdon.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, look, second, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 685.0 965.302439024 71% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.41935483871 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4737876607 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574193548387 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 198.0 283.868780488 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 15.6204993518 43.030603864 36% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 76.1111111111 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2222222222 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30061272396 0.215688989381 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132025874426 0.103423049105 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.170979340142 0.0843802449381 203% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.254993252723 0.15604864568 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.19636881581 0.0819641961636 240% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.0 13.2329268293 60% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.06 11.4140731707 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.