The map below is of the town of Gartsdon. A new supermarket (S) is planned for the town, The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The supplied map represents the town of Garlsdon. The map shows the two possible sites for the supermarket, as planned for the town. The first potential town is in countryside and another is in town centre.
As it is observed from the map, the town Garlsdon has a population of well nigh 65000. In the north and south of town, industrial area is located. The first viable site is in between main roads and railways. It is quite far from industry but near to housing area. This site is roughly near to the individuals of Hindson in contrast to the people of Bransdon and Cransdon.
At the outer side of town, there is a countryside in a rectangular shape. In the centre of the town, there is a town centre without any traffic zone. The second potential spot for supermarket is in town centre. It is well nigh to railways. The population of Cransdon, which is 29000, is 25 km away from second site whereas Bransdon, which is 15000, is 16 km away from second viable site. Railway track starts from north west side of town and ends at south east side of the town.
While analysing overall, the second spot is near to railways, all main roads and industry in contrast to the first potential site.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 134, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...e supermarket, as planned for the town. The first potential town is in countryside ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, second, so, well, whereas, while, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 984.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.53456221198 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47397205021 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.456221198157 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.9632367336 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 65.6 112.824112599 58% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 14.4666666667 22.9334400587 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.86666666667 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.09268292683 318% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306746949971 0.215688989381 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123681587762 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.150930448875 0.0843802449381 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210793221102 0.15604864568 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.171566904541 0.0819641961636 209% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.1 13.2329268293 54% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.65 61.2550243902 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 10.3012195122 50% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.4 11.4140731707 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.02 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.4329268293 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.