The maps below shows the museum’s plant in 1998 and after some changes were made in 2008. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Given are the maps which illustrate significant modifications made to a museum during a period of 10 years, starting from 1998.
As can be observed, the area witnessed fundamental changes during the given period, with the most significant being the shift in locations and the addition of some facilities to make it larger and more convenient.
Looking at the northern part, the café was narrowed down, but a decade later, a WC was added to its right side while a new restaurant was erected on the left side where an empty land used to be. Situated in the center, the garden saw no alteration in size. However, 10 years later, it was upgraded, with the addition of a sitting area in the top left corner and a fountain at the bottom.
During the given period, there had also been the relocation of the temporary exhibition room to the north which was enlarged simultaneously to equal the scale of the garden. The area where it used to be in the South-west was then utilized for housing bags and coats together with the construction of a shop which could be found in the South-East in 1998. Nevertheless, the entrance where tickets are sold remained intact.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are the maps which illustrate significant m...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 958.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71921182266 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71121298006 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591133004926 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5617342419 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.75 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.375 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0839767905374 0.215688989381 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0372352958784 0.103423049105 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.040886124978 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0628737322933 0.15604864568 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0412220945426 0.0819641961636 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.