The number of tourists visiting Malaysia and Dubai from 1995 to 2003 is presented below.
Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown in the diagrams below
The given line graph compares the number of tourists in two destinations, namely Malaysia and Dubai over an eight-year span starting from 1995.
Obviously, in the 1995-2001 period, the number of tourists travelling to both Malaysia and Dubai witnessed a steep growth, however, from 2001 onwards, the trends were completely different. Having attracted approximately 50 thousand visitors in 1995, the figure for Dubai slightly declined for a brief period and then made a dramatic recovery. In 2003, Dubai attracted 400 thousand visitors, which was almost eight times higher that in 1995. However, after a span of considerable rise from 1995 to 2001, the number of travellers to Malaysia reached its peak of nearly 350 thousand in 2001 before suffering a rapid drop in the subsequent years.
In addition, in terms of attracting tourists, there was a significant change in the position of the two countries. Having been the more favourite destination, Malaysia saw a decrease in the number of tourists from 2001 to 2003, becoming the less admired one.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 106, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...nations, namely Malaysia and Dubai over a eight-year span starting from 1995. ...
^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a eight-year span starting from 1995. Obviously, in the 1995-2001 period, the ...
^^^
Line 3, column 564, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...avellers to Malaysia reached its peak of nearly 350 thousand in 2001 before suffe...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a rapid drop in the subsequent years. In addition, in terms of attracting tour...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...rapid drop in the subsequent years. In addition, in terms of attracting touris...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 889.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22941176471 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82848217578 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.4562104171 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.0 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2857142857 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239749561554 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111665690601 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0548592945751 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16404286973 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349594907778 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.