The pie chart below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts compare spending in Japan and Malaysia in terms of various categories in 2010.
Overall, spending on housing and food and others goods and services accounted for the largest proportion of expenses in both Japan and Malaysia. In addition, Japan expenditures on transport and health care were double compared with Malaysia.
34% of expenses in Malaysia, which accounted for the largest part, was for housing while the figure for Japan was 21%. In terms of food, the figure for Malaysia was slightly higher more than that for Japan, at 27% and 24% respectively. However, the proportion of others goods and services in the expenditure of Japan (29%) was 3% more than that in expenses of inhabitants in Malaysia (26%).
The percentage of spending on health care was lowest in both nations, at 6% (Japan) and 3% ( Malaysia). In Japan, 20% of household spending went on transport. This figure was double that shown for Malaysia.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 89, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...west in both nations, at 6% Japan and 3% Malaysia. In Japan, 20% of household spe...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, while, as for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 775.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96794871795 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64602309108 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 72.0 106.607317073 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.461538461538 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 225.9 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.2914551748 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.1111111111 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156998334509 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0885716441142 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500176407079 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130249478922 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497613699572 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.