The pie chart below show the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these main causes affected three regions of the world during 1990s.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given pie chart and table illustrate the proportion of the causes of degraded farmland and the effects of these causes in three different regions by comparing the precentages of land becoming degraded in North America, Europe and that in Oceania in 1990.
As can be seen in the pie charts, animal over-grazing, indiscriminate logging and over-cultivation are the main causes of global farmland degradation, accounting for 35%, 30% and 28%, respectively. Other causes, while, constituted 7% collectively.
According to the shown table, during 1990s, Europe is the region, having the most percentages of degraded land in three regions, taking up 23%, while there is a small difference between that of North America and Oceania, representing 5% and 13%, successively. Moreover, 9.8% land in Europe is degraded by tree clearance, while the impact of this cause in North Ameria and Oceania is minimal, with only 0.2% and 1.7% respectively. Oceania is the region where 0% land is affected by over-cultivation, whereas 7.7% land in Europe and 3.3% North America’s farmland is degraded by this cause. However, farmland in Oceania is degraded seriously by over-grazing (11.3%), compared with only 5.5% that in Europe and 1.5% that in North America.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 32, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'during the 1990s'.
Suggestion: during the 1990s
...tively. According to the shown table, during 1990s, Europe is the region, having the most ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1053.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31818181818 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1085355993 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570707070707 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 313.2 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.1285699085 43.030603864 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.428571429 112.824112599 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2857142857 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146897918033 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0686014533387 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578355119885 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113188415952 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0467520753522 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.2329268293 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.