The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie chart indicates the causes which affect negatively the productivity of agriculture lands while the table illustrates the percentage of land degradation in separated three areas due to those factors mentioned in the 1990s.
Overall, over-grazing is the primary reason which results in the global land degradation. It is clearly seen that from the table that Europe had the highest proportion of total land degraded than the other two regions.
Looking at the details, there are four reasons why agriculture land become less productive. Over-grazing accounted for the largest percentage among four reasons with 35%. Deforestation came in second place, at 30% and 28% of international land degradation belonged to over-cultivation while only 7% for other reasons.
Regarding to the table, there are some difference about the main causes of less production of land in three regions and how they affect the land’s production. Europe is badly degraded by 23% which was constituted from 9.8% of deforestation, 7.7% of over-cultivation and 5.5% of over-grazing. The total land degraded in Oceania was 13%, in detail, deforestation made of 1.7% and over-grazing was 11.3%; surprisingly over-cultivation did not influence in the land degradation in this region. The percentage of land degraded in North America was 5% with the proportion of deforestation, over-cultivation and over-grazing was 0.2%, 0.3% and 1.5% respectively.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, regarding, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 3.97073170732 453% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1223.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58447488584 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.43408747375 2.65546596893 129% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557077625571 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 366.3 283.868780488 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2402422139 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.3 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190430742926 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0913795611371 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0924911281403 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128148250276 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0495268112016 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 61.2550243902 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 11.4140731707 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.