The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie chart elucidates the major reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive whilst the table illustrates how these repercussions influenced three various nations of the world during the 1990s.
Overall, over-grazing was the fundamental cause of worldwide land degradation compared to over-cultivation and deforestation when the highest proportion of ground degraded by over-grazing and North America remain the successful region, which collected the least rate of total land degradation.
To begin with, over-cultivation and deforestation were the important sources of agricultural land degradation, which made up 28 and 30 percent with just 2 percent difference, however, over-grazing was the fundamental cause of less productivity of the land by experiencing 35 percent compared to the other reasons, which were only 7 percent.
Moreover, the most excessive rate of over-grazing happened in Oceania by 11.3 percent when North America witnessed just 1.5 percent in the 1990 years. Subsequently, over-cultivation made up 7.7 percent, which was a higher proportion rather than Oceania where the rate was 0 percent in this period. Distinctly, the least percent of deforestation faced in North America by 0.2 percent while in Europe, it was 9.8 percent and the highest total land degradation, which was 23 percent occurred in this region.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1153.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67980295567 4.92477711251 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36695813689 2.65546596893 127% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546798029557 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 342.0 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.249951267 43.030603864 166% => OK
Chars per sentence: 192.166666667 112.824112599 170% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.8333333333 22.9334400587 148% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 5.23603664747 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131255120539 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0918219706336 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138155680908 0.0843802449381 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134101702471 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.152097391294 0.0819641961636 186% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.2 13.2329268293 168% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.52 61.2550243902 48% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 6.51609756098 224% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 10.3012195122 168% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.26 11.4140731707 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 23.0 11.4329268293 201% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 23.0 11.0658536585 208% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.