The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts represent an information on mean costs of households in 2010 for Japan and Malaysia. According to the legend, five main types of expenditures are presented.
Overall, it is clearly seen that expenditures on other goods and services were the most significant in the case of Japan (around 30%), while for Malaysia housing accounted for the biggest part of total costs (slightly over one third). Regarding the least noticeable category of expenditures, health care shared only 6% for Japan and 3% for Malaysia. The rest of costs types were distributed inequally in these two countries. For Japanese, food was in the second place in terms of share of costs in total budget (just under one fourth); two final categories - health care and transport - reached one fifth of all costs each. On the other hand, food and other goods and services expenses were in the second and third places in Malasia with 27% and 26%, respectively. Finally, 10% of Malaysians money were in 2010 spent on the transport.
Taking everything into consideration, in 2010 shares of expenses on five general categories were different in Japan and Malaysia with various top-expenditure areas. Nevertheless, the least money in both countries was spent on the health care.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, nevertheless, regarding, second, third, while, in the second place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1047.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10731707317 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83011810437 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570731707317 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 315.9 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.351080946 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.7 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3 5.23603664747 197% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13720485405 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0659905745612 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0841889194621 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145369440215 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105966886623 0.0819641961636 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.