The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The provided two pie charts illustrate the average household spending in two nations (Japan and Malaysia) in the year 2010. It is clear that Japan spent more money on other goods and services where Malaysia spent on housing.
According to the chart, both countries spent least money on health care. For Japan, only 6% of money was spent on health care where Malaysia spent only half of the money than Japan. After that, for transport, a minority (10%) of household spent by Malaysia, although, Japan spent double expenditures than Malaysia of a fifth (20%) in 2010. In fact, food was remained stable in both countries, 24% in Japan and 27% in Malaysia
However, housing expenditures was popular in 2010 for Malaysia, went at almost a third (34%), but Japan fell slightly to over a fifth. But, Japan was remained at the top in terms of goods and services spending at 29%, however, Malaysia diminish slowly to over a quarter.
Overall, Japan was popular in three spending, where, Malaysia was famous in two spending.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 40, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'spent the least'.
Suggestion: spent the least
... According to the chart, both countries spent least money on health care. For Japan, only 6...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 422, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntries, 24% in Japan and 27% in Malaysia However, housing expenditures was popula...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, third, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 843.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87283236994 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43685327164 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543352601156 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7721372565 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.375 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.625 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231321047945 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118595709286 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0718592135814 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153417561525 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0693470240585 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.