The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pair of charts illustrate percentages of household expenses spent by a country in 1950 and 2010.
Overall, the average expenditure experienced radical changes throughout the period. While in 1950, almost the total spending was allocated to housing, it was much more equally divided 60 years later.
One prominent feature is that housing took up the lion share in 1950, accounting for virtually three quarters of the year’s expenses but decreased significantly to less than a quarter in 2010. A similar pattern applied to education spending, though less dramatic compared to housing, shrinking from 6.6% to 6.3% at the end of the period.
On the contrary, the proportion of public money devoted to food tripled after six decades from over a tenth of the total expediture to approximately a third. Spending on transportation and other aspects, which used to take up a modest share of the nation’s budget with no more than 5% went to each, rose considerably in 2010, accounting for 14 percent and 19.2 percent respectively. Never exceeding five percent, the expenses of health care still took up a minimal proportion of the total spending even though it has doubled over the period.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, still, third, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1010.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17948717949 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92534325099 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641025641026 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7942067843 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.25 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.375 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0954725477636 0.215688989381 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0504386733093 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0700803176796 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0851487547825 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0807517717961 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.