the pie charts show the expenditures of a school in the UK in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
Given are three pie charts revealing the expenditure of a school in the UK for various sectors during the period from 1981 to 2001.
It is evident that teacher’s salaries made up by far the largest proportion of school’s spending in all two decades. By contrast, insurance remained the smallest cost in each year.
In 1981, 40% of school’s budget went on teacher’s salaries. This then rose to 50% in 1991 before a mere of 5% decline, to 45% in 2001. Other workers’ salaries also came second in 1981, accounting for 28%, however, this figure then halved to only 15% for subsequent two decades. In a stark contrast, although being the smallest share of school’s spending, insurance saw a exponential rise from a mere of 2% in 1981 to 8% in 2001.
It is interesting to note that Occupying the similar proportion of school’s budget, at 15% in 1981, nonetheless, after 10 years, resources climbed significantly to 20%, 15% higher than furniture and equipment. However,by 2001 the former experienced a dramatic fall of 11%, to 9%, by contrast, the latter soared to a staggering 23%, which was the second largest proportion listed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are three pie charts revealing the expendit...
^^^
Line 5, column 390, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...f school's spending, insurance saw a exponential rise from a mere of 2% in 1...
^
Line 7, column 223, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , by
...er than furniture and equipment. However,by 2001 the former experienced a dramatic ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, nonetheless, second, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 979.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09895833333 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16134678551 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619791666667 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0742738111 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.777777778 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27073791545 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109793006792 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119578022346 0.0843802449381 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178661364939 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.150368522081 0.0819641961636 183% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.