price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables, sugars and sweets, and
carbonated drinks
The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables,
sugars and sweets, and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and
make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
This line graph compares the relative prices of three product groups and consumer-price index and how these changes from 1979 to 2009.
Overall, the prices for all product groups, as well as consumer-price index increase during the period of 30 years. However, only the rate of fresh fruits and vegetables is faster than that of consumer-price index (CPI).
In the 1979-2009 period, the steady increase in the price for consumer-price index was with in range of 60 and 210. Prices for sugars and sweets and carbonated drink show similar trends. Although their prices also rose, they were consistenly below consumer-price average after 1987. The final figures of sugars and sweets were 200 on the graph, higher than carbonated drink at 150.
While price for fresh fruits and vegetables approximately grew the same with consumer-price index between 1979 and 1987, throughout the remainder of the period, it significantly increase from 110 to 330. Therefore, price for fresh fruits and vegetables is higher than that of consumer-price index (CPI)
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 62, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...od, the steady increase in the price for consumer-price index was with in range o...
^^
Line 4, column 179, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'increases'?
Suggestion: increases
...mainder of the period, it significantly increase from 110 to 330. Therefore, price for f...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, therefore, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 878.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25748502994 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91974967209 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556886227545 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.5058680596 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5555555556 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5555555556 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.23603664747 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.350660629315 0.215688989381 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.178560987751 0.103423049105 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0681362533703 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224852251994 0.15604864568 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0517433007353 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.