price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables, sugars
and sweets, and carbonated drinks
The line graph provides information about changes in price in the USA of three
different food product groups from 1979 to 2009, and the overall trend in the
consumer price index over this 30-year period.
Overall, it is clear that prices increased for the three food product groups, despite
fluctuations. Only the increase in the prices for fresh fruits and vegetables was
significantly higher than the rise in the general consumer price index.
All the lines on the graph have the same starting figure in 1979. Over the period,
the consumer price index rose steadily from around 60 in 1979 to over 200 in
2009. Prices for sugar and sweets and carbonated drinks showed similar trends.
Although their prices also rose, they were consistently below the consumer price
index average after 1987. After many minor fluctuations, the number for sugar and
sweets was 200 on the graph in 2009, higher than the final figure for carbonated
drinks at 150.
Prices rose sharply for fresh fruits and vegetables, particularly after 1989. From
the same figure of about 60 at the start of the period, the prices finished at roughly
330 on the index in 2009.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 79, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...out changes in price in the USA of three different food product groups from 1979 ...
^^^
Line 2, column 57, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...roduct groups from 1979 to 2009, and the overall trend in the consumer price i...
^^
Line 2, column 72, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rom 1979 to 2009, and the overall trend in the consumer price index over this ...
^^
Line 2, column 80, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to 2009, and the overall trend in the consumer price index over this 30-year p...
^^^
Line 4, column 86, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r the three food product groups, despite fluctuations. Only the increase in the ...
^^^
Line 5, column 83, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ices for fresh fruits and vegetables was significantly higher than the rise in th...
^^^
Line 7, column 84, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...arting figure in 1979. Over the period, the consumer price index rose steadily ...
^^^
Line 8, column 30, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... period, the consumer price index rose steadily from around 60 in 1979 to over...
^^
Line 8, column 40, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the consumer price index rose steadily from around 60 in 1979 to over 200 in ...
^^
Line 8, column 79, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y from around 60 in 1979 to over 200 in 2009. Prices for sugar and sweets and c...
^^^
Line 9, column 72, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ets and carbonated drinks showed similar trends. Although their prices also ro...
^^
Line 9, column 82, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rbonated drinks showed similar trends. Although their prices also rose, they we...
^^^
Line 10, column 43, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...though their prices also rose, they were consistently below the consumer price ...
^^
Line 10, column 82, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e consistently below the consumer price index average after 1987. After many mi...
^^^
Line 11, column 83, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r fluctuations, the number for sugar and sweets was 200 on the graph in 2009, hig...
^^^
Line 12, column 81, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...her than the final figure for carbonated drinks at 150. Prices rose sharply ...
^^^
Line 13, column 16, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... figure for carbonated drinks at 150. Prices rose sharply for fresh fruits a...
^^^
Line 14, column 12, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rbonated drinks at 150. Prices rose sharply for fresh fruits and vegetables...
^^
Line 14, column 21, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... drinks at 150. Prices rose sharply for fresh fruits and vegetables, particu...
^^
Line 14, column 86, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...getables, particularly after 1989. From the same figure of about 60 at the start...
^^^
Line 15, column 87, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e period, the prices finished at roughly 330 on the index in 2009.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 974.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0206185567 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34906810204 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515463917526 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The sentence length is short
Sentence length SD: 41.2717821277 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.4 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.2 5.23603664747 23% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 15.0 3.83414634146 391% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 21.0 1.69756097561 1237% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302897248718 0.215688989381 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13686200249 0.103423049105 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104516850621 0.0843802449381 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102544378718 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0967532881228 0.0819641961636 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.