The given bar graph reveals the information about the ratio of travellers who travel to work by using four different means of transport in single European city in three different years ( 1960, 1980 and 2000 ).
Overall, it can be said that the highest percentage of people go to work by walking in the initial year. The maximum proportion of people like to go work by using bus and in the middle and last year respectively.
According to the given graph, it is clear that in 1960, an average value of travellers who used to travel to and from work by walking was just below 35%. The workers who went to work by bus and bike was about to 18% and 25% respectively. Only 5% of people went to job by using their car. After two decades ( 1980 ), the percentage of worker who went to their job on bus was around 25% which was nearly 3% greater than the figure of those peoples who commuted to their office by car. The minor difference was seen in those workers who visit to their office by using bike and foot and the figures was lied between 20% and 15%.
In the year 2000, the highest proportion of workers were gone to work on car that was 35%. Whereas, the least proportion of employees used their bike to go to job which was nearly 5%. An average value of travellers who travel on bus was just over 15%. Approximately 9% of workers went to office by walking.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 185, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e European city in three different years 1960, 1980 and 2000 . Overall, it can...
^^
Line 1, column 206, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ree different years 1960, 1980 and 2000 . Overall, it can be said that the hig...
^^
Line 3, column 171, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... people like to go work by using bus and in the middle and last year respectively...
^^
Line 5, column 306, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ob by using their car. After two decades 1980 , the percentage of worker who went...
^^
Line 5, column 312, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...using their car. After two decades 1980 , the percentage of worker who went to th...
^^
Line 5, column 598, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'lain'.
Suggestion: lain
...using bike and foot and the figures was lied between 20% and 15%. In the year 200...
^^^^
Line 7, column 92, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... were gone to work on car that was 35%. Whereas, the least proportion of employees used...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 3.15609756098 380% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 33.7804878049 166% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1106.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 253.0 196.424390244 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.37154150198 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3217011091 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.450592885375 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 325.8 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2516215187 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.1666666667 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0833333333 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.916666666667 5.23603664747 18% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158805622413 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.067785037517 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0795725351227 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123559672504 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0914409207603 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.07 11.4140731707 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.61 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.