The fact cannot be denied that robberies have been common in recent years. Some people have a fear of being robbed outside the houses but robberies are happening inside the houses also. The forthcoming paragraph will scrutinize the reason of getting robbed and some surities that people can make for their security.
On the one side of the coin, somewhere, people are addicted towards robbery as they find this an easiest way of earning money and to fulfill their requirements. People are less workholic and feel commute as a burden due to which they choose the wrong path and being the part of bad community which always harm the society. Similarly, most of the youngsters are addicted to drugs which persuades them to be a robberer. When they donot get the money while by asking family members and even to peer groups then they started indulging in robberies like doing chain snatching, taking purses of women, pulling the mobile phone and so on. By selling this material, the earn money and with this money they purchase drugs. That is how people are being robberer.
On the contrary, the foremost think that a person can apply to ensure their security is the online payment criteria. With this, there is no need to carry money whereas, they can deposit this amount in bank and can make the payments directly through banks via numerous applications such as Bharat pe, Paytm and many more or even by ATM cards which will automatically make the money safe. The second formula which can be taken by police. They can make the public ensure by providing one constable in each street. If any incident will happen then public can contact the police man to take instant actions against enemy. Hence, society can make these major efforts for their own security.
In conclusion, people who are less workholic and addicted towards drugs have choose the way of robbery for their assessments while, police can protect the society by ensuring them with sudden action and public can use digital payment platforms for money safety.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 181, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...bberies are happening inside the houses also. The forthcoming paragraph will scrutin...
^^^^
Line 3, column 95, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...icted towards robbery as they find this an easiest way of earning money and to ful...
^^
Line 3, column 659, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ne and so on. By selling this material, the earn money and with this money they purchase...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 512, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...providing one constable in each street. If any incident will happen then public ca...
^^
Line 7, column 78, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'chosen'.
Suggestion: chosen
...rkholic and addicted towards drugs have choose the way of robbery for their assessment...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, second, similarly, so, then, whereas, while, in conclusion, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 1.00243902439 1496% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.15609756098 349% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 24.0 5.60731707317 428% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1683.0 965.302439024 174% => OK
No of words: 345.0 196.424390244 176% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87826086957 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 3.73543355544 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29779215145 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 106.607317073 181% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559420289855 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 283.868780488 184% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.5474288358 43.030603864 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.1875 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5625 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221819567642 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0824849817521 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.068572490038 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148361082806 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0725973685605 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 40.7170731707 184% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.