the table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015
The table compares two primary schools in term of the proportion of students with all seven educational problems between 2005 and 2015,
In general, it is considerable that school A had higher the percentage of pupils who struggled in both schools. However, while school A managed the incidence of all problems, school B saw an overall rise in almost problems.
In 2005, the number of following instructions areas peaked at 42% in school A, whereas only 6% of pupils in school B experienced this problem. Similarly, with those problems which school A's pupils deal with such as concentrate ability in lessons,verbal expression of ideas,listening skills and spelling had a significant percentage from 30 to 40. In contract, these figures in school B just stood at between 10% and 12%.
By the year 2015, School A witnessed a considerable decrease of 24% and 22% from struggling to follow instructions and concentration in lessons respectively, this school also saw falls of 15%, 14% and 5% in figures for children who had problems with listening, verbal expression and spelling. On the other hand, the numbers of pupils who got trouble from following instructions and spelling were doubled in school B, while the figure for those students attending can't express their ideas by verbal, troubles with listening and reading had a slight increase of 1%. And the percentage of students in both school who had problem with handwriting remained stable over a period of 10 years
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tional problems between 2005 and 2015, In general, it is considerabl...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aw an overall rise in almost problems. In 2005, the number of follow...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 257, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , verbal
...h such as concentrate ability in lessons,verbal expression of ideas,listening skills an...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 284, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , listening
...ty in lessons,verbal expression of ideas,listening skills and spelling had a significant p...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...B just stood at between 10% and 12%. By the year 2015, School A witnessed a c...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 336, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lling. On the other hand, the numbers of pupils who got trouble from following in...
^^
Line 7, column 401, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...from following instructions and spelling were doubled in school B, while the figu...
^^
Line 7, column 475, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...the figure for those students attending cant express their ideas by verbal, troubles...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, similarly, so, whereas, while, in general, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1236.0 965.302439024 128% => OK
No of words: 242.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10743801653 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98978293433 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570247933884 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 341.1 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.4445561382 43.030603864 185% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.5 112.824112599 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.25 22.9334400587 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 5.23603664747 210% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211778371228 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104355439566 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738692943343 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162290314192 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0952203499476 0.0819641961636 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.2329268293 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.95 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.