The table below gives information on consumer on different items in five different countries in 2002.

Essay topics:

The table below gives information on consumer on different items in five different countries in 2002.

The table informs the percentage of budget spent on three types of item in five Europe countries in 2002.
It can be seen that Ireland and Turkey are the two most countries which have the money spent on food/drink/tobacco the highest with 28,91% and 32,14%. Next are Italy, Spain, Sweden with 16,36%, 18,80% and 15,77%, respectively.
The proportion of money spend on clothing and footwear accounts for 9,00% income of Italian and 6,63% in Turkey. The figures are much lower in expenditure spent on the same category in Spain (6,51%), Ireland (6,43%) and Sweden (5,40%).
The percentage of annual income of these five countries spend on the last category is the lowest. Spending 4,35% total income on leisure/education in Turkey, the Italian spent 3,20% and the Swedish spent 3,22%, which it's virtually identical. The range of expenditure on the same type of items varies from 2,21% in Ireland and 1,98 % in Spain.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...6,51%, Ireland 6,43% and Sweden 5,40%. The percentage of annual income of these fi...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 759.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99342105263 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71892282536 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585526315789 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 212.4 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.9333272771 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.875 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.0 5.23603664747 0% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119725201107 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0615000926241 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10238888966 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102977798633 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127075652126 0.0819641961636 155% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.