The table illustrates percentage of family that possessed each kind of consumer durables (cenrtal heating, television, cacuum cleaner, refrigerator, washing machine, dishwasher and telephone) in the UK from 1972 to 1983.
Overall, the proportion of families that buoght house appliances increased over a span of eleven years.
The percentage of central heating increased moderately from 33% in 1972 to 64% in 1983. Television was a necessity for family and its possession rate expanded slight from 93% in 1972 to 98% in 1983. By way of contrast, No family had video player before 1982 and the percentage of family owned it was merely 18% in 1983. In the similar vein of television, percentage of family that purchased vacuum cleaner raised slowly from 87% in 1972 to 95% in 1982.
Percentage of refrigerator and washing machine shared the same pattern of increase from 73% in 1972 to 94% in 1983. On the contrary, no family had a dishwasher before 1976 and merely 3% of family possessed it in 1978 and the following year; the figure increased to 5% in 1983. Possession of telephone demonstrated a steady increase from 42% in 1972 to 75% in 1981; afterward, the number showed 2% expansion in 1982.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The table illustrates percentage of fami...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lephone in the UK from 1972 to 1983. Overall, the proportion of families that...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...creased over a span of eleven years. The percentage of central heating increa...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wly from 87% in 1972 to 95% in 1982. Percentage of refrigerator and washing m...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
kind of, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1003.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99004975124 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83985921768 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532338308458 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5090890087 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.444444444 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167020634598 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0799908357573 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504397945744 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103199386767 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0650972095757 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.