The table below shows the figures for imprisonment in five countries between 1930 and 1980.
Write a report for a university, lecturer describing the information shown below.
The supplied table enumerates the number of prisoners in different countries, namely, Canada, Australia, Great Britain, United States and New Zealand from 1930 to 1980. The highlighting feature is their is mild increase in number of prisoners in Great Britain in between 1930 to 1980.
The number of prisoners oscillates throughout these five years in United States. It was on paramount in the year 1940, 1960, 1970 and 1980. Canada has the mostest prisoners in 1930 with 120. After this, the number of captives palpitates after every decade. It was on its gutter position in 1970 with well nigh to 82. Even, the Great Britain had the maximal figure of detainees in 1980 with roughly 82.
Moreover, Australia has its maximum number of prisoners in 1930 with 70. Later on, it fluctuates after every decade. In 1930, New Zealand was on the second highest position with 100. Afterwards, it was on sequential upsurge with 90 in 1980.
While analysing overall, United States had the maximal figure of prisoners in 180 well nigh to 138 and The Great Britain had the least number of detainees in 1930 with 30.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 198, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
...30 to 1980. The highlighting feature is their is mild increase in number of prisoners...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...eat Britain in between 1930 to 1980. The number of prisoners oscillates througho...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, second, so, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 924.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91489361702 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46877283155 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489361702128 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.5093312357 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.0769230769 112.824112599 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.4615384615 22.9334400587 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.84615384615 5.23603664747 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0957133888895 0.215688989381 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0399704927475 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.028252638002 0.0843802449381 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0662633096484 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0235757049084 0.0819641961636 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 61.2550243902 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.