The table below shows the number of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and year after It was refurbished The charts showed a result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit during the same two periods

The given table illustrates the change in the number of visitors after Ashdown museum was revamped while the pie charts depict the proportion of visitors who shared how gratified they were with the visit prior to and post transformation.

Overall, the influx of visitors grew with the Museum's refurbishment. Before refurbishment, there were the largest proportion of visitors who were dissatisfied with their visit to the museum while post refurbishment, the greatest proportions of visitors had vented their satisfaction. However, the proportion of those who were unwilling to respond to the survey had remained unchanged.

The total number of visitors to Ashdown Museum increased by 18000 visitors, growing from 74,000 to 92,000 post refurbishment.

Two out of five visitors expressed their dissatisfaction in the survey with regard to their visit to the museum. However, this ratio had declined to paltry 15 percent after the museum was remodelled. By contrast, there were more visitors who expressed their satisfaction as the proportion of those who were very satisfied rose considerably from 15 percent to 35 percent of visitors.

While the ratio of the very dissatified went down from one out of ten to one out of twenty, the ratio of those who never responded to the survey remained at 5 percent. The greatest proportion of visitors were satisfied after the museum was reopened to the public after being redesigned. The proportion rose by 10 points to account for two out of twenty five visitors.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, while, with regard to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1112.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19626168224 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94640156938 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.453271028037 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 341.1 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7275116577 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.555555556 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7777777778 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288475478844 0.215688989381 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138085111428 0.103423049105 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100488032573 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205020801707 0.15604864568 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0689355272977 0.0819641961636 84% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.