The given table illustrates the change in the number of visitors after Ashdown museum was revamped while the pie charts depict the proportion of visitors who shared how gratified they were with the visit prior to and post transformation.
Overall, the influx of visitors grew with the Museum's refurbishment. Before refurbishment, there were the largest proportion of visitors who were dissatisfied with their visit to the museum while post refurbishment, the greatest proportions of visitors had vented their satisfaction. However, the proportion of those who were unwilling to respond to the survey had remained unchanged.
The total number of visitors to Ashdown Museum increased by 18000 visitors, growing from 74,000 to 92,000 post refurbishment.
Two out of five visitors expressed their dissatisfaction in the survey with regard to their visit to the museum. However, this ratio had declined to paltry 15 percent after the museum was remodelled. By contrast, there were more visitors who expressed their satisfaction as the proportion of those who were very satisfied rose considerably from 15 percent to 35 percent of visitors.
While the ratio of the very dissatified went down from one out of ten to one out of twenty, the ratio of those who never responded to the survey remained at 5 percent. The greatest proportion of visitors were satisfied after the museum was reopened to the public after being redesigned. The proportion rose by 10 points to account for two out of twenty five visitors.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, while, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.97073170732 353% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1266.0 965.302439024 131% => OK
No of words: 242.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23140495868 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97543617113 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.446280991736 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 382.5 283.868780488 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.8807989535 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.090909091 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.09090909091 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303658309136 0.215688989381 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136039473535 0.103423049105 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0916685845801 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190263998673 0.15604864568 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.073609176363 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.