The table below shows personal savings as a percentage of personal income for selected countries in 1970, 1990, and 2000.

The table provides information regarding the saving proportion of the person for the year of 1970,1990 and for 2000 of 7 different countries.
Overall, it can be seen that almost all the given countries decreased while only for the UK it is increased from 1970 to 2000.
By 1970, Italy has the highest rate of saving 29.5 %, followed by France with 19.7% and Japan with 17.6% while Canad has least saving rate of 5.6%.
By 1990's data we can say that Italy had still led with 17.6% saving rate. But fro Canada the saving rate is almost doubled while Germany had a stable rate of 13.8% for the year 1970 and 1990.
By 2000, Only France, Japan, and the UK had risen up in saving percentage while all other countries had decreased their saving rate, but for Canada, the saving rate is dramatically dropped from 11.5% to just 1.9% and It was the lowest percentage of given data.
To sum up, the percentage of saving was stable for some countries and some were raised up while some were went down.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 118, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'has the least'.
Suggestion: has the least
... 19.7% and Japan with 17.6% while Canad has least saving rate of 5.6%. By 1990s data we ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 78, Rule ID: FOR_FRO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'for'?
Suggestion: for
...d still led with 17.6% saving rate. But fro Canada the saving rate is almost double...
^^^
Line 6, column 90, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r some countries and some were raised up while some were went down.
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, regarding, so, still, while, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 816.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.53333333333 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.19095431758 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538888888889 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7093462774 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.571428571 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7142857143 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299882930345 0.215688989381 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153795101241 0.103423049105 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106948334039 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16975146702 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104904006192 0.0819641961636 128% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.29 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.