The given chart shows the percentage of families living in poverty in 1999 in Australia. The mentioned parameters are family type and proportion of people living poverty.
It is clear from the data that sole parents are the ones who was mostly suffering from the poverty problem, about 21% of people in this category lived in poverty.About 19% single families with no children were also faced this situation followed by couple with children (12%). Aged couples are the wealthiest group among these categories, only 4% of them were experienced this poverty issue. Single aged person and couple with no children were also suffered very less during 1990, the figure are 6% and 7% respectively.
The detailed view of table reveals that, in terms of numbers couple with children are the ones who suffered high during this poverty crisis in 1990. Which consisted almost 60% people lived under poverty followed by single with no children and sole parent family persons.
In conclusion, Old age people were less affected by this poverty problem. Whereas sole parent and adults with no children category people were greatly affected and couple with children and couple with no children family persons were moderately affected by this poverty condition.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 163, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: About
...eople in this category lived in poverty.About 19% single families with no children we...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, whereas, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1049.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19306930693 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42449452638 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514851485149 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 323.1 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.2445008869 43.030603864 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.555555556 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4444444444 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55555555556 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 1.13902439024 790% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129788586819 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0836796681931 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0815885455498 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122339279459 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0951082288904 0.0819641961636 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.