The table below shows the results of surveys in 2000, 2005 and 2010 about one university.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The tabular chart depicts the percentage of students giving positive ratings about one university in 2000, 2005 and 2010. The striking feature of the chart is an improvement of pupil's virtue of the university's electronic resources.
At a fleeting glance, it is clearly seen that there was a consistency in the student's view regarding the teaching facilities and buildings in all the years. However, only 32% individuals gave the good ratings to the range of modules offered which further steadily dropped by 2% in the following year. Again, after the interval of 5 years it collapsed to 27%. Although, almost a half number of Students provided positive rating to electronic gadgets which later became a review of a significant majority of individuals.
Moving further,there was approximately an uniform positive rating for the print resources in 2000, 2005 and 2010. Last but not least, almost two-third people credited the good reviews in the subsequent years while number was surged by 6% in the 2010.
All-in-all, the satisfaction rate of scholars was declined for some aspects and remained stady for the others.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 15, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , there
...jority of individuals. Moving further,there was approximately an uniform positive r...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 40, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... Moving further,there was approximately an uniform positive rating for the print r...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, regarding, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 945.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87802980449 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627777777778 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.3976567471 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.073810667389 0.215688989381 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.03278241384 0.103423049105 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575986595139 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0493369742775 0.15604864568 32% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508990875273 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.