The table below shows the results of surveys in 2000, 2005 and 2010 about one university. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The supplied table depicts the change in attitude of students regarding numerous aspects of a university in the year 2000, 2005 and 2010. The highlighting feature of the table is ratings given by students to print resources, which was maximum in 2005 with 89%.
The ratings to the quality of teaching was 65% in 2000 and it deteriorates in 2005 with just an insignificant percent. But again, it mounted to 69% in 2010. There was dramatic improvement in the electronic resources which was 45% in 2000 and risen to 88% in 2010. The buildings/teaching facilities has the same ratings throughout these 10 years. It was nor plunged neither mounted itself.
The students ratings towards range of modules offered had been plunged. It was 32% in 2000 whereas only 27% in 2010. From the year 2000 to 2005, the print resources depicts improvement in ratings with 2% whereas it curtailed itself with 1% in the year 2010.
While analysing overall, the ratings of electronic resources represents rocketed improvement from 45% to 88% in 10 years whereas the range of modules offered has plummeted from 32% to 27% throughout these 10 years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... which was maximum in 2005 with 89%. The ratings to the quality of teaching was ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, regarding, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 945.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97368421053 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83723266523 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.478947368421 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.8714146299 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.9090909091 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2727272727 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.45454545455 5.23603664747 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10660644589 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.050595726558 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430299849399 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0733240652185 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469356194704 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.