The table below shows the sales made by a coffee shop in an office building on a typical weekday. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features,and make comparisons where relevant

The stipulated chart shows the details regarding the sales figures of a coffee shop in a commercial building on a normal working day. The mentioned parameters are coffee, tea, pastries and sandwiches.

It is clear from the data that, the shop sells maximum number of coffee during earning morning (265) and evening times(200). During the afternoon period, the coffee sale accounted for its lowest sales figure of 145 cups. Whereas tea sales are very less as compared to former, only accounted less than half (110) of the coffee sales figures. Just like the coffee, tea sales are at maximum during 5 :30 - 10:30 (110) and 5:30 - 8:30 (75). Between 2:30 and 5:30 the sales figures of tea hit the lowest digit of 35 cups.

On the other hand, the snacks sale showing a completely different trend as compared to drinks. In mornings pastries sales (275) is higher than any other snack. But during mid day times the sandwich sales leading in front with 200 pieces. From 2:30 to 5:30 sandwitch sales are on the bottom accounted for only 40 pieces. While pastry sales are at deck during evening times (80). The important point to be noted that, there has been a reverse trend in the sales of pastries and sandwiches.

In conclusion, it is evident that consumers selection of drinks and snacks vary according to the timings. During mornings many of the consumers prefer to have coffee and pastries but in the afternoons they prefer sandwiches over pastries. Coffee is popular among all the consumers despite the time factor.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 250, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...5 cups. Whereas tea sales are very less as compared to former, only accounted less...
^^
Line 5, column 24, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'snacks'' or 'snack's'?
Suggestion: snacks'; snack's
...t of 35 cups. On the other hand, the snacks sale showing a completely different tre...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 35, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'consumers'' or 'consumer's'?
Suggestion: consumers'; consumer's
.... In conclusion, it is evident that consumers selection of drinks and snacks vary acc...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, regarding, whereas, while, in conclusion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1249.0 965.302439024 129% => OK
No of words: 259.0 196.424390244 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82239382239 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36698518571 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 106.607317073 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544401544402 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 360.9 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.0984309655 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 78.0625 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1875 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131278392075 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0490954690532 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0370912389392 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0891177550298 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0293881554574 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.38 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.