The table compares the water used in three categories among six countries in the year of 2001.
Overall, irragation consumed the majority water in all the six countries and domestic water usage composed the minority water consumption. Meanwhile, the amount of water used in industry varied from country to country.
Water used in agriculture dominated the whole water usage in all the six countries. Russia was the country that consumed the most quantity of water for irragation, which was 1633 cubic meter. Besides, Canada and Turkey also irragated farmland with an enormous amount of water, which were 1238 and 1462 cubic meter respectively. By contrast, China consumed the least amount of water for irragation, which was 605 cubic meter.
Industrial water usage diverged among countries. China used the least quantity of water in industry, and it is the same with domestic water usage. By comparison, Turkey industry consumed the largest amount of water, which was 731 cubic water. Moreove, domestic water usage is low in most countries, except in Australia and Canada. Chinese people merely used 26 cubic meter water at home. By contrast, Australians consumed enormous water for domestic use.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 186, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'meter' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'meters'.
Suggestion: meters
...er for irragation, which was 1633 cubic meter. Besides, Canada and Turkey also irraga...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 309, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'meter' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'meters'.
Suggestion: meters
...f water, which were 1238 and 1462 cubic meter respectively. By contrast, China consum...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 419, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'meter' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'meters'.
Suggestion: meters
...ter for irragation, which was 605 cubic meter. Industrial water usage diverged amo...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1015.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31413612565 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54790456228 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486910994764 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 319.5 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.4342172729 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 78.0769230769 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6923076923 22.9334400587 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.84615384615 5.23603664747 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.09268292683 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182359385585 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0903141925986 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461627525738 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148956064632 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0287447383567 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 61.2550243902 80% => It means the essay is relatively harder to read.
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.