The table shows the number of employees and factories producing silk in England and Wales between 1851 and 1901.
The given table demonstrates the workforce in two countries, namely England and Wales in a span of 50 years starting from 1851.
It is noticeable that the number of men and women involved in silk industry witnessed a considerable drop in the surveyed period. Having been at a peak of 53,964 and 76,786 in 1851, the statistics for male and female workers suffered a significant decline in the subsequent years, sinking to a new low of 13,375 and 25,567 in 1901, respectively. Consequently, the total number of workers decreased by approximately four times in 100 years.
In contrast, the number of silk-producing factories experienced a period of erratic movement. In 1851, the number of factories was at the lowest point of 272, then increased dramatically to 761 in 1861. However, the following years saw a slight decline, apart from a partial recovery in 1881.
Another significant feature to note is that there were far more female workers participating in silk production than male ones in the whole conducted years. To illustrate, the number of women nearly doubled that of men in 1901.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a span of 50 years starting from 1851. It is noticeable that the number of men...
^^^
Line 3, column 36, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... It is noticeable that the number of men and women involved in silk industry ...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...approximately four times in 100 years. In contrast, the number of silk-producin...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...apart from a partial recovery in 1881. Another significant feature to note is t...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, then, apart from, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 921.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06043956044 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01183612853 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60989010989 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5436703146 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.333333333 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275051706235 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101736679998 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0718867862666 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147087838002 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.044964769695 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.