The given table illustrates cellphone makers worldwide share in 2005 and 2006. The mentioned parameters are seven leading mobile manufacturers.
It is clear from the data that Nokia was the leader in terms of market share in 2005 and 2006 with a market share of 32.5% and 35% respectively.The three major players Nokia, Motorola and Samsung combinedly owned almost 75% of the total market in 2005 and 2006 outplayed all the other players by far behind.
A detailed view of the chart reveals that, the manufacturers like Sony, LG, BenQ only had a very small percentage of market share in both years. The BenQ mobile had least market share in both years of 2005 and 2006 which amounts to only 4.9% and 2.4% of the total market. Motorola's market share showed a considerable increase as compared to previous year figures followed by Nokia. In addition, there was decline in others market share also by 3% in 2006.
In conclusion, interestingly all the cellphone makers retained their market position during the mentioned period regardless of some fluctuations in their market share.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 145, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...ket share of 32.5% and 35% respectively.The three major players Nokia, Motorola and...
^^^
Line 5, column 162, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'had the least'.
Suggestion: had the least
...et share in both years. The BenQ mobile had least market share in both years of 2005 and ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 242, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...2005 and 2006 which amounts to only 4.9% and 2.4% of the total market. Motorolas ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 908.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04444444444 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.712021705 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594444444444 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.779972723 43.030603864 171% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.5 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327636043322 0.215688989381 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152034855832 0.103423049105 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0611718402729 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189443752591 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.061707091735 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.