The stipulated charts below shows the information regarding the sale of fair-trade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in EU nations. The mentioned parameters are UK, Switzerland, Denmark, Belgium and Sweden.
it is clear from the data that, Coffee sales were increased in all the five countries. One important point to be noted that, Coffee sales in England were increased by almost 10 fold within a short span of 5 years of time. The consumption was hiked from just 1.5 million Euros to 20 million Euros. Switzerland also showed the same upward trend but not that much as UK's. In Switzerland the demand for coffee was almost doubled and achieved 6 million Euros of trade in 2004. Other three countries Denmark, Belgium and Sweden showed a decent increase of 0.2 million, 0.7 million and 0.2 million respectively.
On the other hand, the business of fair- trade labelled bananas showed almost similar trend. Just like the coffee trade, Switzerland and Great Britain consumed the most. Switzerland consumption volume almost raised thrise (47 million euros) as compared to previous figures. Likewise, UK's sales reached not so high as volume of 5.5 million. Belgium also showed the three fold rise in purchase of bananas. Whereas, In Sweden and Denmark , people lost their interest in bananas and showed a decline in it's sales by 0.8 million and 1.1 million respectively.
In conclusion, the demand for coffee continued on a rise in all the European continents. While, the popularity of banana was declined in countries like Sweden and Denmark.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...erland, Denmark, Belgium and Sweden. it is clear from the data that, Coffee sal...
^^
Line 5, column 433, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... bananas. Whereas, In Sweden and Denmark , people lost their interest in bananas a...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... million and 1.1 million respectively. In conclusion, the demand for coffee con...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, likewise, regarding, so, whereas, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1302.0 965.302439024 135% => OK
No of words: 256.0 196.424390244 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0859375 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63093148551 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 106.607317073 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 382.5 283.868780488 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.8116350783 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.8 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0666666667 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178059235546 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0647251406278 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0887400852644 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135043050036 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0857607188945 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.