The bar chart below illustrates the proportions of Canadian participating in various types of sports in the year 1998 in comparison with 2005.
According to the chart, it is demonstrated that cycling and tennis were less common than other sports by the year 1998 with almost over 7% and 8% respectively. They are behind the downhill (about 8.5%) and volleyball near 10%, though baseball is the third prevalent sport (close 17%) during 1998. Swimming stood on fourth alternative by Canadian by near 15%, while basketball and soccer could not exceed over 10 during the same year.
On the other hand, when it comes to the year 2005, approximately all the sports became slightly less well-known except soccer that could be a bit more popular among people and reached about 10%. The most distinctive sport that lost its reputation in the Canada was basketball and it encountered a dramatic drop and mere almost 8% took part in this sport in 2005. Similarly, tennis and swimming experienced an average significant decline and accounted for over 5% and 10% during these 7 years.
TO sum up, it is manifestly obvious that Canadian not only were less fond of sport generally in 2005, but they also gave up some of their beloved sport enormously.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 165, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...some of their beloved sport enormously.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, similarly, so, third, well, while, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1034.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92380952381 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64549417988 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633333333333 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.7349342897 43.030603864 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 129.25 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.25 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.75 5.23603664747 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0997924974194 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0491533214744 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0460339723982 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0746970159916 0.15604864568 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0452786939184 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.