The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981,1991 and 2001.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The three graphs compare the percentages of annual expense for five different reasons by a school in the UK. Figures are given for 1981, 1991 and 2001.
Overall, it is clear that the teacher's salaries made up the most of the spending. Also, the proportion of spending on insurance gradually increased by the year while the opposite pattern could be observed for spending on other workers' salaries.
In 1981, 40% of the annual spending of the school were paid to the teachers. The figure leaped up to 50% in 1991 and dropped marginally to 45% in 2001. The same amount of money was spent on resources and furniture & equipment in 1981. However, 20 years later, the spending on furniture & equipment almost tripled that of resources, in which numbers stood at 23% and 9% respectively.
The expense for insurance was on the rise, started from 2% in 1981 then increased to 3% in 1991. In 2001, another 5% was added to the spending on insurance. On the other hand, payments for other workers were cut down gradually, from 28% in 1981 to only 15% in 2001.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 871.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70810810811 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54490399834 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583783783784 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.1053302831 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.1818181818 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8181818182 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.81818181818 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187162052142 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0782575448367 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528217102226 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117103527202 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0545835907732 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.74 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.