The stipulated pie diagrams depicts the main sources of energy in the United State of America in 1980 and 1990. The mentioned parameters are nuclear power, hydroelectric power, coal, natural gas and oil.
It is clear from the data that, In 1980, USA depended more on fossil fuels for generating power, which together almost accounted for 70% of total energy source. Out of which 42% of energy was from oil and 26% was from natural gas. Renewable energy sources like hydroelectric power and nuclear power was constituted only a very small proportion of America's total energy requirements, which was 5% each. 22% of country's energy was generated from coal as well.
In 1990 also, Unites States energy source dependence was almost the same but there was some changes in proportions. Like their dependence on oil was reduced by 9% and on natural gas was reduced by a mere 1% as compared to the previous record. The important point to be noted that, a marginal increase on the dependence on nuclear power, it was almost doubled and constitute 10% of its required energy from it.
In conclusion, it is evident that USA's reliance on non- renewable energy sources showed a declining trend except in coal. While, there dependence of natural energy sources showed a rising trend.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 163, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...heir dependence on oil was reduced by 9% and on natural gas was reduced by a mere...
^^
Line 7, column 123, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...howed a declining trend except in coal. While, there dependence of natural energy sou...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 196, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l energy sources showed a rising trend.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, well, while, as to, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1068.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96744186047 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60816208556 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562790697674 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 333.9 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.117261442 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0909090909 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5454545455 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36363636364 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 3.70975609756 297% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163329141989 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.079631583055 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575072650566 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115469924029 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.035355106611 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.