Wheat Exports from 1985 to 1990 (in million tonnes)
The amount of wheat exported from three different regions over the five-year period from 1985 to 1990 is depicted in the line chart. It has been observed that the wheat sold abroad by European Community experienced an increase while that of Australia witnessed a decrease. Interestingly, exports Canadian market fluctuated during the period shown.
In 1985, Australia traded 15 millions of tonnes of wheat and the following year the number rose by one million tonnes to 16 million. After falling moderately by 4 million for the next three years, the wheat exports stabilized at about 12 million tonnes in 1990.
Conversely, over the same period, exports Australian market started at around 17 million in 1985 and that of declined by three million tonnes to 14 million by 1986. However, after that, the figure recovered strongly until 1990 and reached approximately 21 million tonnes.
A number of Canadian exports varied greatly. There was a fluctuation in wheat exports by just under 20 million tonnes between 1985 and 1990.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 27, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '15 million'.
Suggestion: 15 million
...eriod shown. In 1985, Australia traded 15 millions of tonnes of wheat and the following year ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 864.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17365269461 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63595507744 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59880239521 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.7658836601 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5555555556 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.640617089331 0.215688989381 297% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.252007263401 0.103423049105 244% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.158125147876 0.0843802449381 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.399203213057 0.15604864568 256% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0905401143765 0.0819641961636 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.