Writing Task 1
You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The charts below show local government expenditure in 2010 and 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The two pie graphs given illustrate different provincial government expenses in 2010 and 2015. Overall, it can be clear that the percentage changes were generally insignificant.
In 2010, the government invested nearly a quarter of their total amount of money in education. The percentage of total expense that was 3% lower was Healthcare expenditure. They also invested19% and 17% of their money in paying for retired residents and local defense, respectively. Other investments were not very noticeable and they were only responsible for one fifth of the government’s expense.
In 2015, these figures oscillated a little bit. Compared with the first chart, the second chart demonstrates that the government less spent on Education and Healthcare about 3% and 1%, respectively. The investment in Pension remained unchanged, it was about 19% of the total expense. There were also small reductions in the percentage of money poured in Defense. However, we can see that they concentrated more in Welfare as well as loans’ interest as the proportion rose significantly about 5% in both categories. Investment in transport, culture and leisure and other basically unchanged and they were still accountable for the least.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 38, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
.... In 2015, these figures oscillated a little bit. Compared with the first chart, the sec...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 638, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y were still accountable for the least.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, so, still, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1035.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44736842105 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.113766235 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615789473684 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 315.0 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.7558350954 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.25 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8333333333 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.08333333333 5.23603664747 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0880122677814 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0326755626078 0.103423049105 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0299781856231 0.0843802449381 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0621176348328 0.15604864568 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0153049030511 0.0819641961636 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 61.2550243902 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.