The line graph shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a 6-month period in 2011.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features, and make comparison where relevant.
The presented line graph compares three means of information in terms of their reports received by the Tourist Information Office of a certain urban area from January to June in 2011.
Overall, telephone was the least popular tool for enquiry among three surveyed counterparts, reflected by its lowest figure throughout the period. In addition, while it was also the only section expressing a general decrease, opposite trends were witnessed in remaining categories.
Turning into detail, in the first quarter, starting at approximately 300, enquiries sent by telephone expanded gradually to reach the peak of exactly 400, which subsequently fell to below 300 queries in March. Meanwhile, similar levels of fluctuation were displayed in other groups. However, while face-to-face enquiries slightly went up, those of email remained unchanged at 400 at the end of this stage.
Regarding to the next quarter, the figure for telephone questioning was kept stable by April, before declining steadily to above 200 questions in June. By contrast, in comparison queries sent by person, which grew considerably to over 800, the number for email significantly increased to about 1200 questions. Moreover, this remarkable gain made it surpass two remaining sectors to be the most prevalent mean of inquiring, according to data collected until June.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.48453608247 80% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 5.05154639175 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.03092783505 66% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 32.9175257732 21% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 26.3917525773 186% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.85567010309 130% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1149.0 937.175257732 123% => OK
No of words: 207.0 206.0 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55072463768 4.54256449028 122% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.78020617076 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90361875775 2.54303337028 114% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 127.690721649 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.695652173913 0.622605031667 112% => OK
syllable_count: 343.8 290.88556701 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.41237113402 120% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.83505154639 163% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 1.44329896907 554% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6804123711 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 16.3608247423 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.0555127546 44.8134815571 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.666666667 76.5299724578 167% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 16.8248392259 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 4.34317383033 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 7.41237113402 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13989228511 0.216113520407 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0498303062241 0.0766984524023 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0869806183354 0.0603063233224 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.095962458964 0.12726935374 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109876471932 0.0580467560999 189% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 8.37731958763 193% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 70.7449484536 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 7.45979381443 180% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 8.71597938144 175% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.19 7.59969072165 134% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 41.2886597938 172% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 8.62886597938 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 8.54432989691 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 8.15463917526 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.