Dear Sir,
This is in reference to your restaurant 'Paprika Park' at Habitat Centre. I was there for dinner on sunday night and was quite disappointed with the meal and service.
'Paprika Park' being a reputed restaurant I decided to take my family for dinner as I have heard a lot about the food and ambience.
Firstly, we were told that the waiting time would be 20 minutes but it extended to 40 minutes. Then as we sat down the air conditioner was not working. We still decided to dine as it was already late and everyone was hungry.
Our order was taken after another 10-15 minutes as the waiter did not attend properly. The order took another 30 minutes. We had ordered a non-vegetarian dish and we were served a vegetarian one. The bread along with it was dry and stale.
I would like you to train your staff well as well as get your air-conditioners repaired. Also check into pantry as to why the food is stale.
Your faithfully,
XYZ
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 10, column 38, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'well as'.
Suggestion: well as
... I would like you to train your staff well as well as get your air-conditioners repaired. Als...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 90, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... as get your air-conditioners repaired. Also check into pantry as to why the food is...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, so, still, then, well, as to, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.48453608247 174% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 4.92783505155 41% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 5.05154639175 139% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.03092783505 33% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 32.9175257732 64% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 26.3917525773 61% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.85567010309 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 783.0 937.175257732 84% => OK
No of words: 172.0 206.0 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.5523255814 4.54256449028 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.78020617076 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55599143426 2.54303337028 101% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 127.690721649 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.639534883721 0.622605031667 103% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 290.88556701 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.13402061856 88% => OK
Article: 2.0 0.824742268041 243% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 1.44329896907 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6804123711 103% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 16.3608247423 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.1593101045 44.8134815571 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 60.2307692308 76.5299724578 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.2307692308 16.8248392259 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.15384615385 4.34317383033 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.29896907216 116% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 2.54639175258 79% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 7.41237113402 40% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.94845360825 228% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130227684705 0.216113520407 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0421787063078 0.0766984524023 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0313730666878 0.0603063233224 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0681974194155 0.12726935374 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0377419831252 0.0580467560999 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.6 8.37731958763 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.2 70.7449484536 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 7.45979381443 80% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.22 8.71597938144 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.04 7.59969072165 93% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 41.2886597938 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 8.62886597938 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 8.54432989691 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 8.15463917526 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.