According to a recent study, the more time people use the Internet, the less time they spend with real human beings. Some people say that instead of seeing the Internet as a way of opening up new communication possibilities world- wide, we should be concerned about the effect this is having on social interaction.
How far do you agree with this opinion?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge.
Write at least 250 words.
A recent research has revealed that, considerable time is spent on the internet by people, the less time they spend with real human beings. Some believe that instead of perceiving the internet as a way of opening up new communication possibilities worldwide, we should be concerned about the effect is having social interaction.
To begin with, we cannot deny that the internet has opened up new communication possibilities world-wide. Nowadays, it possible for global businesses to conduct a rendezvous online. This can be done through video conferencing which only requires a good internet network. As a result, this saves large corporate businesses an exorbitant cost involved purchasing flight tickets for attending such meetings. Furthermore, “whatsapp” has made it possible for friends and families to call and text one another as fast as possible over long distances. Consequently, communication becomes reliable.
In addition, it is possible to learn about different cultures by be-Friend people of different norms and values around the globe. Facebook offers such an opportunity .That being pointed out, people learn to appreciate different races. This clarifies the importance of the internet in opening up new communication possibilities.
In contrary, the internet does not offer an avenue to develop social interaction skills. For instance people spend much time on social networks indoors. Following such habit, they develop a difficulty in forming relationships with others. This culminates in one not having friends to confide to during times of need like loss of a loved one maybe.
Moreover, one may miss out in community building activities as a result of lack of social interaction skills. For example, they may have a fear in approaching people, hence helping out at a neighbor `s funeral may be difficult because of lack of socialization techniques. Consequently, neighbors will do the same in case when you are experiencing a familiar situation. This elucidates the negative impact of the internet towards socialization.
In conclusion, it is worth noting that the internet does creates new communication possibilities internationally. Nevertheless, I believe that should it be used equally with social interaction the benefits will be more.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'recent research'.
Suggestion: Recent research
A recent research has revealed that, considerable time is...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 166, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...obe. Facebook offers such an opportunity .That being pointed out, people learn to ...
^^
Line 5, column 168, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: That
...e. Facebook offers such an opportunity .That being pointed out, people learn to appr...
^^^^
Line 12, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...teraction the benefits will be more.
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['consequently', 'furthermore', 'hence', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'nevertheless', 'so', 'for example', 'for instance', 'in addition', 'in conclusion', 'as a result', 'to begin with']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.241813602015 0.247107183377 98% => OK
Verbs: 0.16120906801 0.155533422707 104% => OK
Adjectives: 0.103274559194 0.0946595960268 109% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0428211586902 0.0501214627716 85% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0302267002519 0.0437548338989 69% => OK
Prepositions: 0.128463476071 0.122226691241 105% => OK
Participles: 0.0579345088161 0.0403226058552 144% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.31511444984 2.80594681477 118% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0201511335013 0.0326793684256 62% => OK
Particles: 0.0151133501259 0.00163938923432 922% => OK
Determiners: 0.0906801007557 0.0861772015684 105% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0226700251889 0.021408717616 106% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00503778337531 0.011925033212 42% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2299.0 1933.35771543 119% => OK
No of words: 348.0 316.048096192 110% => OK
Chars per words: 6.60632183908 6.12580529183 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20517956788 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.442528735632 0.374742101984 118% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.35632183908 0.28420135186 125% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.264367816092 0.203846283523 130% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.181034482759 0.137316102897 132% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31511444984 2.80594681477 118% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.037074148 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.56093040696 104% => OK
Word variations: 66.4239493195 60.7387585426 109% => OK
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0891783567 131% => OK
Sentence length: 16.5714285714 20.7743622355 80% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.4909877206 49.517814964 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.476190476 127.492653851 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5714285714 20.7743622355 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.666666666667 0.814263465372 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38877755511 137% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 3.99599198397 100% => OK
Readability: 52.2036124795 49.1944974215 106% => OK
Elegance: 1.82795698925 1.69124875643 108% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.515944785863 0.332605444948 155% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0867332159304 0.102741220458 84% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0902192744561 0.0668466124924 135% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.486766200463 0.534860350844 91% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.154778488268 0.148594505496 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159143231893 0.134430193775 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139173033955 0.0742795772207 187% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.181192055092 0.324371583561 56% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0366032404618 0.0638462369009 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.298269075303 0.228012699653 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.156750157937 0.058150111329 270% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.68436873747 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.41683366733 234% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 6.0 5.90881763527 102% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 2.5751503006 116% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 1.9629258517 255% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 10.4468937876 134% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.