According to a recent study, the more time people use the Internet, the less time they spend with real human beings. Some people say that instead of seeing the Internet as a way of opening up new communication possibilities world-wide, we should be concerned about the effect this is having on social interaction.
How far do you agree with this opinion?
In recent years, there is a phenomenon that many people, especially teenagers, spend a considerable amount of time surfing the Internet instead of real-life communication. While there are some arguments in favour of this lifestyle, I totally disagree with it for the following reasons.
There is no denying that using social network for a long period of time can make us become addicted, causing serious impacts on both emotional and physical health. For instance, an Internet addict is usually lonely, self-centered and unsociable. Besides, a person who spends a great deal of time in the virtual world tends to lose contacts with real people. This means that they do not have any peers or companions to share their feelings and understand their emotional issues.
Another rationale against excessively using computers would be a risk of losing interpersonal skills including the ability to directly communicate with other people. When being online, it is usually the case that Internet surfers use informal or even impolite languages, which may hinder them from communicating in an approaite manner in the real life. Besides, it is also impossible for an Internet addict to make face-to-face conversations as a result of being involved too much in the virtual world. Therefore, they tend to become shy, lonely and cannot talk to others, especially with those of different gender.
In conclusion, although it is true that the Internet itself brings massive advantages to human beings, I am more inclined to the view that we should cut down on the amount of time using the Internet and improve real relationships.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 58, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ng that using social network for a long period of time can make us become addicted, causing se...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, may, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1364.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22605363985 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8789375031 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64367816092 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8553181947 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7272727273 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.90909090909 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296516748679 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0972751040537 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0668535801113 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178805353894 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0444755363892 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.