Because computers can translate all languages very quickly and accurately, learning a foreign language is a waste of time. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is widely acknowledged that people have become over-reliance on the technology in doing day to day task. A contention that made about using computers to translate paper works would be better off than learning languages. Undoubtedly I would rather disagree with this statement and in this essay, I will provide an illustration that using computers have negative outcomes.
obviously, having used computers to translate a text could lead to several impacts. to begin with, a computer translates a literal meaning of the words, word for word, which could deliberately interfere with the comprehensive understanding of a message. furthermore, although computers are accurate, they can't be used everywhere. working as a doctor in a far remote area, for instance, unless you are capable of speaking to the local in their language, it seems that impossible to help them out.
Another drawback associated with relying on computers in translation. It clear that this would destroy a man powerful brain capacities, such as critical thinking, as it has been noticed that the more language you speak the better creative you would become. Moreover, being able to speak many languages besides your mother tongue would enhance social integration with others from different cultural background, which somehow fortifies an avenue of rewarding future.
In conclusion, having looked at the above points, it clear that computers would perform an efficient translation, however, learning languages has far more positive outcomes. thus, I would rather advise the relevant authorities to adopt policies that ensure to including language teaching at schools.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 235, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...off than learning languages. Undoubtedly I would rather disagree with this statem...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sing computers have negative outcomes. obviously, having used computers to tran...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 9, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Obviously
...puters have negative outcomes. obviously, having used computers to translate a t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 92, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
...e a text could lead to several impacts. to begin with, a computer translates a lit...
^^
Line 2, column 262, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Furthermore
...mprehensive understanding of a message. furthermore, although computers are accurate, they...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 307, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ermore, although computers are accurate, they cant be used everywhere. working as...
^^
Line 2, column 314, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... although computers are accurate, they cant be used everywhere. working as a doctor...
^^^^
Line 2, column 339, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Working
...ccurate, they cant be used everywhere. working as a doctor in a far remote area, for i...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 74, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'clears'?
Suggestion: clears
...relying on computers in translation. It clear that this would destroy a man powerful ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rtifies an avenue of rewarding future. In conclusion, having looked at the abov...
^^^
Line 6, column 54, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'clears'?
Suggestion: clears
..., having looked at the above points, it clear that computers would perform an efficie...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 175, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thus
...nguages has far more positive outcomes. thus, I would rather advise the relevant aut...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, so, thus, for instance, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1392.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50197628458 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93735198475 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.644268774704 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1634432786 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.0 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0833333333 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 5.01903807615 239% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163063847485 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0588938215443 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0258651565684 0.0667982634062 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0977329142055 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0116953602718 0.056905535591 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.