The best way for governments to solve the problem of traffic congestion is to provide free public transport in 24 hours per day, and seven days a week. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, we are witnessing an increasingly ubiquitous number of traffic jams, which causes huge difficulty to commuters. Some people hold the opinion that providing free public transport all day is superior to many other solutions. Others, however, think quite differently that it is extremely costly. To be frank, offering free public transport is not the best way and the drawbacks far outweigh its benefits.
First of all, it is an indisputable fact that providing free public transport in 24 hours per day may leave a burden on the national budget. According to the majority of reports, traffic congestion mainly occurs during the rush hours, so it is pointless to providing public transport all the time. Moreover, providing free public transport in the long term may be unachievable due to its tremendous cost. Therefore, I would prefer that this amount of money was invested on enhancing road facilities.
Even more importantly, traffic jams is not only attributed to the vast amount of private transport but also road systems. There is no denying that people always prioritize private cars in case of emergency and essence no matter how attractive the public transport is. Moreover, providing free public transport alone only contributes to cut down the volume of traffic to some extent. In fact, many big cities like Ha Noi still suffer from traffic jams in narrow roads with obsolete infrastructure in spite of the rise in availability of public transport. Therefore, I strongly believe that to address the root of the issue, road needs to be widened and traffic lights and signs should be made more state-of-the-art.
To conclude, provide free public transport all the day seems reasonable that could transform people's lives, but not without negative impacts. On the other hand, I believe that more investments on road systems should be enforced to make commuting more comfortable and time-saving.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 258, Rule ID: IT_IS_JJ_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'provide'?
Suggestion: provide
...g the rush hours, so it is pointless to providing public transport all the time. Moreover...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, in fact, first of all, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1611.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23051948052 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87041449785 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581168831169 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.2573587569 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.4 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5333333333 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.06666666667 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276300757016 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0954293902085 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0809025411607 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17263519595 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0524225348105 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.