The best way for governments to solve the problem of traffic congestion is providing free public transport in 24 hours per day, and seven days a week. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Traffic jam is a hard-solving problem that many metropolises around the world are facing. It is believed that a free public transport system all the day is the best solution to handle this problem, but I totally disagree with this statement.
The feasibility of such a free system should be taken into careful consideration before it is adopted. It is clear that the high costs involved in buying vehicles such as buses and trains, constructing rails and hiring drivers are deducted from the government’s budget. However, the effectiveness of this policy might not be guaranteed due to several drawbacks of public transportation. Compared to private transport, public one is so time-consuming and crowded that commuters seem to experience more discomfort and inconvenience. The increasing crime rates related to pickpockets and sexual harassment on public transport are also serious threats which make this option less preferred. Consequently, it would be extravagant if the government invest a large amount of money into this free system without making the most of it.
Meanwhile, this method may not be the best choice in spite of contributing to the deduction in traffic congestion. In addition to private transport, the low-quality infrastructure such as out-of-date bridges and construction sites on narrow roads in fact make a significant contribution to traffic jam. For instance, bridges and roads are under construction in Vietnam have a huge impact on the flow of traffic. These incomplete facilities which act as obstacles for commuters are in need of being upgraded to alleviate traffic jam.
In conclusion, free public transport is not the most predominant step to resolve the recent traffic issues because of its feasibility. It seems more necessary for the government to figure out other practical options to control these matters.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, may, so, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1572.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40206185567 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19822918966 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594501718213 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.154226942 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 112.285714286 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7857142857 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92857142857 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206069220011 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0677262301874 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487062751683 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13717820608 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0625288048222 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.