the best way to resolve the international environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is recommended that a rising in fuel price is the most effective way to remedy the global environmental issues. While I accept that this measure may exert a positive influence on the problem, I believe that there are possible ways that can outperform it.
On the one hand, it is foreseen that gaining cost of fuel may lead to a marked improvement for the environmental degradation. Indeed, higher fuel expenditure deters citizens from using their personal means of transport. Not only will this reduce the number of vehicles, but also result in a cut down on emission of harmful gases contaminated by transportation, which is one of the most significant contributing factors to heated environmental issues like air pollution, greenhouse effect, ozone layer depletion or global warming. Moreover, the policy also slows down the consumption rate of fossil energy, which is thought to be exhausted in near future. Therefore, it can be seen as an effective solution to the depletion of natural resource as well.
On the other hand, several ways should be proposed so that nations can alleviate environmental problems more effectively.
Firstly, the government may find it necessary to prioritize its budget to innovation of alternative energy. Indeed, compared to gaining fuel price, a temporary measure that only suspends, the fuel austerity, the creation of renewable energy can permanently tackle citizens’ dependence on fossil one, and, therefore completely prevent its exhaustion. Additionally, introducing green taxes and incentives for environmentally friendly designs of new vehicles are also suitable. Particularly, through these measures, the authority can put its weight behind the mission of raising public awareness of environmental problems without enormously harming the oil industry.
Briefly, while gaining the price of fuel is an efficient solution, it seems to me that better measures can be stated to resolve the ecological issue.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 151, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...stated to resolve the ecological issue.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, but, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1667.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51986754967 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15757429469 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629139072848 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.8421179251 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.230769231 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2307692308 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.69230769231 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151390785565 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0550902792364 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0439206679066 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.093107618617 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0293608421954 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.32 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.